Browse our collection of papers in
Legal Systems

C/L/567. Literature Review. Comparative study in contemporary interviewing practice in criminal cases in the UK and Saudi Arabia

WORDS:
3300
DATE:
2010
PRICE:
39.99 GBP

This Literature Review seeks to provide preliminary details for a literature review for a dissertation/comparative study in contemporary interviewing practice in criminal cases in the UK and Saudi Arabia. The paper considers the areas and types of literature to be reviewed – and the research is conducted through a consideration of case law and statutes, and on-line and printed journals, articles, and text books. The research considers the different cultural approaches to interviewing suspects and victims of particular crimes such as rape, and the scope of the different legal systems in investigating such crimes. The study seeks to identify how the system of interviewing exercised by the authorities in Saudi Arabia could be improved on the basis of the UK system, along with the rules of international human rights (Al-Bishr Ibrahim, 2009), as it is often considered that the testimony of women is of lesser importance in the Middle East.

 

KEYWORDS: Literature Review for dissertation, criminal law, interviewing suspects and witnesses, criminal cases, UK law, Saudi Arabian law,

DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER DOWNLOAD THE REFERENCE LIST
 
Other Papers On: Literature Reviews Dissertations
Other Papers On: Legal Systems
Other Papers On: Criminal Law

CUSTOM WRITING

Can't find what you are looking for? Click here to order a custom written paper

Subject Catalogue

Keywords Tag Cloud

law legal system english criminal civil justice reference comparative uk decision discuss systems jury statement dissertation extent france england study profession proposal judges critically rights parliament particular acts examination process outline crime trials evidence impact approach practice adversarial solicitors liberty interventionism active usa barristers forms relevant court organisation form debate factors german rank judiciary previous regulation liability courts literature principles consider commercial precedent explain statutory review judicial international european common contracts procedure relevance determine mediation created history validity confined pages modern western reality global alternative dispute supporting resolution plurality addressing inquisitorial authority asian african assumptions utilising quotation hart concept dworkin theoretical offender models th accurate depart rules it convinced wrong rehabilitation children diversity lack capital suggest coul changes result appointment consultation scotland ensured transparency fairness accusatorial saudi probation effectiveness conditions deterring re people libyan trust centre victim evaluation shift applicability offending corporate liberties suspects execution police duties protection balance policy sentencing rome processes lower services financial traditional shifted doctrine disadvantages benefits including arabia contemporary applying interviewing developing bound scots leases pendens lis binding dissenting minorities uniform fused tenants eviction rental arrears appointments punishment suspicion autonomy patient functions independence allows wit hong miscarriages expansion access laws welfare kong brought religious clarity dictates denomination religion appropriat inconsistent beliefs providing belief sanctions discipline exclude increased woolf grounds equality regimes takeover audience extending human concepts impacts eu equity fowl pest business differences asses similarities perspective french lord statistical evaluating social legislation environmental responsibility complexity compare contrast wales inevitably continuous change wording relating involved using capable results satisfying legitimate expectations choice control probable contract cause principle regard reasonable difference due vs inevitable justifiable restorative degree describe liable manufacturers interpretation british ontologically institutional instances parties product remedies certainty available third subjective epistemologically c uncertainty meant term conceptualising argument support searle objective methods unclarity influence normally
GET OUR GooGLE TOOLBAR BUTTON
Click here
BOOK MARK US
WHAT OTHERS
HAVE SAID
I got the paper thanks it will come in very handy for my course thank you. Nicholas