S/L/175. "Civil right advocates assert that the Australian Parliament's legislative response to the threat of terrorism is disproportionate and fundamentally abrogates the rights and liberties of Australians which existed before 11 September 2001." Provide a critical analysis and evaluation of the relevant legislation, and comment on whether you believe that the legislative measures strikes an appropriate balance between security and personal freedoms

The paper examines the anti-terrorism legislation in Australia passed after 11 September 2001 discussing the definition of 'terrorism offence' and arguing whether civil rights are under the threat of misuse by the government and authorities. The balance between security and personal freedom in Australia in regards to civil rights is discussed.