This paper examines the claim whether share price growth is a valid corporate objective, and whether managerial compensation should be linked to such growth. This maxim has been an accepted theory in finance since the 1970's but has recently been revisited. The revision finds that this objective is not a wholesome one, and firms should instead focus on increasing overall corporate value. This is a long term goal, and better than the short termism encapsulated in the original principle. Moreover, it is rooted on a false premise, for SPG is nothing more than an expectation measure, and assuming that markets are efficient, managers cannot expect to exceed the market's expectations. In addition, it finds that SPG leads to an underinvestment, mainly due to the rejection of zero or near zero-NPV projects. Further, IRR and payback are not adequate measure of value of actual returns and than better measures such as EVA could be used.
If you are ever dissatisfied with the services we
provide, we will try our very best to put the matter right. However, due to the nature of the products that are offered for
sale on this website, we have strict "no refund" policy.
All papers are for research and reference
purposes only! Copyright 2002-2008 Papers4You.Com All Rights Reserved.
Papers For You; Mile End Rd; London E1 4AQ UK